Category:Question & Answer
Q: Dear Athos, allow me to ask you some questions:
I was looking on the net for something about the Master Hilarion mentioned by
A.A. Bailey and I bumped into ….that I recommend you…
Dear Fabio, I don’t see why I should scourer through web sites if I am “happy”
with the direct contacts I’ve got, thank you.
Q: … is it ok “the Teaching of the Temple” – Ed.
If “the Teaching of the Temple” is the one I know, it’s ok.
Consider, though, that these are layman’s works of modest level, just as
modest is the intellectual depth of the audience they are addressed to. In short,
if you are looking for real answers you won’t find them there. If you like,
at some time I’ll demonstrate why, through the words of the Masters.
Q: What relationship is there between the theosophical work group of Esonet
Esonet is not a “theosophical work group”…
The Theosophical Society created and wanted by Blavatsky has been for a long time
the instrument for “exteriorizing” the experimental teaching
of Three Masters. After the death of Blavatsky and with the arrival of Annie Besant,
with all her “eccentricities”, this Society has been abandoned (it
has been said and written many times). It started a search for other expressions
linked to Disciples close to the Hierarchy (see Alice Bailey, Elena Roerich and
more recent ones).
Unfortunately, of the old “initiatory splendor” in the present Theosophical
Society, only the philanthropic feeling and a memory of the “good old times”
are left. These are overwhelmed, though, by a reproachable “Cult
of the Personality” for the late Disciple Blavatsky who, of course,
is already re-incarnated in another “corner of Service”.
There is still an old “theosophical teaching” but it is outdated and
therefore stale. Just as it happened for the old Yoga, the previous teaching as
well is an “instrument” by now enclosed in the advanced “words”
of more updated subjects and therefore more suitable to consciences which are
more organized than the past ones.
Q: Why is it written that one of the tasks that the Master has towards
the Disciple who’ll be able to get close to him is to teach him the four-dimensional
use of the centers? If the fourth dimension is time, what does this have to do
with the centers?
The multi-dimensionality of the centers is not referred to any temporal factor
but to a complex energetic polarity that we could express as: from ++ and - -
distribute themselves in +- and +-.
This formula is the “objective” description of the development of
the “cardiac center” (transformer of cold energy
or cold light) that, before reaching the superior center, the one of the head,
must create the energetic bypass called “scapular
center” (the myth of the “wings”), whose quadri-polar
development leads to the synthesis (1) of the “coronal center”.
As I’ve already anticipated, this energetic multi-dimensionality
(7 bodies = 7 chakras = 7 energies) doesn’t have anything to do with the
time factor, which is only the subjective aspect of the
physical level (level of the material manifestation). It is an aspect
that is visible mainly because of the consumption of the physical aspects; without
them, time doesn’t exist. It doesn’t appear in any other dimension
other than the physical sphere.
In order to demonstrate this assumption, we can see how the principle
of eternity is always associated with the aspect of non-temporality.
It is true what you say. This is a subject that develops between Master and Disciple.
In order to know more about it, then, you will have to wait until you’ll
meet someone keen on telling you the “rest”.
In the meantime I fraternally greet you
Esonet’s Editorial Staff